Another Baby Has Been Added to the Family

First, let me say that we really do have a new baby in the family. Our grandson Mkey and his wife, Brittany, have a precious new son named Cameron Michael, and my hubby and I got to go visit our number-four great grandchild yesterday. It was delightful!

But we also have another new “baby” in the family–my latest book release, The Deliverer, the third and final novel in the Freedom Series. I’ll admit to being almost as excited about the third book in the series as I was the first and second, but I’m wondering if that’s true with readers.

Over the years I seem to have noticed a trend with publishers. Could be I’m just imaging it, but I get the impression that they pour more time and enthusiasm (and maybe even advertising dollars) into the “firstborn” in a series, leaving the remaining books to suffer the “middle” or “youngest child” syndrome.

You know what I mean. With our first child we take pictures of absolutely EVERYTHING they do. We faithfully fill out their baby books, and we read up on proper parenting manuals in hopes of not making any serious mistakes that might scar the poor things for life. The second child? We still take a handful of pictures now and then, though we never get around to downloading them from our camera phone. And a baby book? Well, hey, at least we got one and put the child’s name in it. But by the third one? We figure the annual school pictures are enough, and who needs baby books anyway?

Back to my thoughts about book series. Is it possible to maintain the same level of excitement with sequels as it is with the first book? I suppose if that first book is an absolute blockbuster, then sure, no problem. Readers are already standing in line to buy it. But if that wasn’t the case, then what? It even becomes a bit more of a challenge to promote them.

For instance, my current series is about human trafficking. The first book elicited all sorts of media invitations to discuss such a hot topic. But are those same media venues going to invite me back a second and third time to discuss the same subject?

I’d love to hear from you authors about what you done successfully (or not) to help promote sequels in your series; I’d REALLY love to hear from readers about what it takes to sustain interest in a series for you. Can books be released too far apart? Too close? Was it the quality of the first book in a series that pushed you into line to buy the sequels? If the first book was mediocre, is there any chance at all you’ll consider buying the other books in the series?

Thanks for any/all input, gang!

About alandkathi66

I'm a wife, mother, grandmother, and great grandmother, married to my junior/senior high school sweetheart, Al. I am the author of 40 books, with several more in process. I enjoy speaking and teaching at writers' conferences and women's events, and I am passionate about supporting the persecuted Church and fighting human trafficking. I also serve as Senior Vice President of Acquisitions for Elk Lake Publishing. My most recent releases are The Singing Quilt (March 2014); The 40-Day Devotional Challenge (January 2014); The Doctor's Christmas Quilt (October 2013).
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Another Baby Has Been Added to the Family

  1. Iola says:

    I can see why publishers push the first book in a series more, especially where the books are related by common characters as well as a common theme or location.

    As a reader, I REALLY don’t like buying the second or subsequent books in a series if I haven’t already read and enjoyed the earlier books. so if you/they don’t catch me on that first book, I’m unlikely to try the others. But there are exceptions – and if I do read and enjoy a sequel, I am quite likely to go back and purchase the earlier books.

    On the quality of the individual books: if the first was mediocre, I’m less likely to rush out to buy the sequel at full price. I might buy it if I see it discounted, or borrow it from the library.

    I’m more forgiving with the second book, because I’ve read a lot of trilogies where the second book is quite weak, then the third book finishes everything off nicely. But a trilogy where the first book is good, the second ok and the third is weak? I’m going to hestiate before trying that author again. There are so many good and great authors.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.